Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
The convention on human rights and biomedicine and the use of coercion in psychiatry
- Correspondence to: Professor T Tannsjo Department of Practical Philosophy, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; torbjorn.tannsjophilosophy.su.se
Citation
The convention on human rights and biomedicine and the use of coercion in psychiatry
Publication history
- Accepted April 22, 2003
- First published October 5, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Coercion and pressure in psychiatry: lessons from Ulysses
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- “Idiots, infants, and the insane”: mental illness and legal incompetence
- Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?
- Informal coercion in inpatient mental healthcare: a scoping review protocol
- Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry: two illustrative cases
- Ethics of deliberation, consent and coercion in psychiatry
- Using coercion in mental disorders or risking the patient’s death? An analysis of the protocols of a clinical ethics committee and a derived decision algorithm
- Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: study protocol for a nationwide prospective multicentre study
- Care or custody? Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry