Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
The convention on human rights and biomedicine and the use of coercion in psychiatry
- Correspondence to: Professor T Tannsjo Department of Practical Philosophy, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; torbjorn.tannsjophilosophy.su.se
Citation
The convention on human rights and biomedicine and the use of coercion in psychiatry
Publication history
- Accepted April 22, 2003
- First published October 5, 2004.
Online issue publication
October 05, 2004
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Coercion and pressure in psychiatry: lessons from Ulysses
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- “Idiots, infants, and the insane”: mental illness and legal incompetence
- Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?
- Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry: two illustrative cases
- Ethics of deliberation, consent and coercion in psychiatry
- Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: study protocol for a nationwide prospective multicentre study
- Care or custody? Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry
- Is psychiatry becoming more coercive?
- Tuberculosis, non-compliance and detention for the public health