Article Text
Abstract
The extent to which society utilises the law to enforce its moral judgments remains a dominant issue in this era of embryonic stem cell research, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and human reproductive cloning. Balancing the potential health benefits and diverse moral values of society can be a tremendous challenge. In this context, governments often adopt legislative bans and prohibitions and rely on the inflexible and often inappropriate tool of criminal law. Legal prohibitions in the field of reproductive genetics are not likely to reflect adequately the depth and diversity of competing stakeholder positions. Rather, a comprehensive and readily responsive regulatory policy is required. Such a policy must attend to the evolving scientific developments and ethical considerations. We outline a proposal for effective, responsive, and coherent oversight of new reproductive genetic technologies.
- genetics
- new reproductive technologies
- law
- criminal law
- policy
- bioethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
↵† The data was collected by Environics between March 7 and 24 2002 and involved 2014 Canadians.
-
Sources of support: The Health Law Institute is supported in part by the Stem Cell Network and Genome Prairie. The Indiana University Center for Bioethics is supported in part by the Indiana Genomics Initiative (INGEN). The Indiana Genomics Initiative is supported in part by Lilly Endowment Inc. The Hastings Center work on reproductive genomics is funded by The Greenwall Foundation and The Overbrook Foundation.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- A brief and personal history of ‘what’s in a name’ in reproductive genetics
- The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure