Article info
Clinical ethics
A Scottish researcher’s response
Citation
A Scottish researcher’s response
Publication history
- First published August 2, 2004.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2004
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Overlap of premature birth and permissible abortion
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Mixed motives, mixed outcomes when accused parents won’t agree to withdraw care
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- ‘Best interests’ in paediatric intensive care: an empirical ethics study
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith