Article Text
Clinical ethics
Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby
Abstract
In the United Kingdom women have access to termination of pregnancy for maternal reasons until 24 weeks’ completed gestation, but it is accepted practice for children born at or beyond 25 weeks’ gestation to be treated according to the child’s perceived best interests even if this is not in accordance with parental wishes. The authors present a case drawn from clinical practice which highlights the discomfort that parents may feel about such an abrupt change in their rights over their child, and argue that parents should have greater autonomy over treatment decisions regarding their prematurely born children.
- abortion
- consent
- child
- treatment withdrawal
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire
- Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: a plea for a family centred approach
- The role of the courts in clinical decision making
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?
- Worth living or worth dying? The views of the general public about allowing disabled children to die
- A Scottish researcher’s response
- Overlap of premature birth and permissible abortion
- Avoiding anomalous newborns: preemptive abortion, treatment thresholds and the case of baby Messenger