Article info
Miscellaneous
Prenatal sex and race determination is a slippery slope: author’s reply
Citation
Prenatal sex and race determination is a slippery slope: author’s reply
Publication history
- First published August 2, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Is sex ratio at birth an appropriate measure of prenatal sex selection? Findings of a theoretical model and its application to India
- Why parents should not be told the sex of their fetus
- Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?
- Prevalence and correlates of sex-selective abortions and missing girls in Nepal: evidence from the 2011 Population Census and 2016 Demographic and Health Survey
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Falling sex ratios and emerging evidence of sex-selective abortion in Nepal: evidence from nationally representative survey data
- Recent sex ratio at birth in China
- Projecting sex imbalances at birth at global, regional and national levels from 2021 to 2100: scenario-based Bayesian probabilistic projections of the sex ratio at birth and missing female births based on 3.26 billion birth records
- ‘The more we change, the more we remain the same’: female feticide continues unabated in India
- The promise of a boy: Indian women are being mis-sold drugs to change their babies’ sex