Article info
PDFMiscellaneous
Prenatal sex and race determination is a slippery slope
Citation
Prenatal sex and race determination is a slippery slope
Publication history
- First published August 2, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Prenatal sex and race determination is a slippery slope: author’s reply
- Prevalence and correlates of sex-selective abortions and missing girls in Nepal: evidence from the 2011 Population Census and 2016 Demographic and Health Survey
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Falling sex ratios and emerging evidence of sex-selective abortion in Nepal: evidence from nationally representative survey data
- Why parents should not be told the sex of their fetus
- Why sex selection should be legal
- Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?
- What is it to practise good medical ethics? A Muslim's perspective
- Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: lessons from Canada
- Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection