Article Text
End of life
Medical ethics, logic traps, and game theory: an illustrative tale of brain death
Abstract
Decision making and choices are frequent themes in medical ethics. Game theory is based upon modelled decision making. Game theory, and associated logic traps, may have relevance to the clinical practice of medicine and medical ethics. The “prisoner’s dilemma” is one logic trap from game theory in which “rational” decision making on the part of participating individuals can lead to “suboptimal” situations. An example of such a situation involving brain death is presented and discussed from the perspective of the prisoner’s dilemma.
- brain death
- logical traps
- medical ethics
- prisoner’s dilemma
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Models of the medical consultation: opportunities and limitations of a game theory perspective
- The consultation game
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants
- Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications
- Do the ‘brain dead’ merely appear to be alive?
- Book club: The Hard Problem
- Reply to: Defining death: when physicians and families differ
- Heart surgery and transplantation: innovations impacting on concepts of life and death
- Death and organ donation: back to the future