Article Text
Abstract
Evaluation of the potential of a cocaine vaccine requires a detailed understanding of the intended and unintended social consequences of its use. Prospective technology assessment is always difficult, but in the case of treatment and prevention of cocaine addiction we need to understand not only the neuroscience and pharmacology of cocaine addiction, but also social attitudes to drug use and addiction, the social context of drug use, and the factors which make drug use a rational strategy for an addict and make treatment seeking or relapse more or less likely. By considering different scenarios related to differing levels of effectiveness of the vaccine, the authors argue that vaccination will be at best a useful adjunct to existing methods of treatment, rather than a substitute for them.
- cocaine
- vaccine
- drug dependence
- treatment
- public policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Linked Articles
- Symposium on drugs
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethical issues in using a cocaine vaccine to treat and prevent cocaine abuse and dependence
- Silent myocardial damage in cocaine addicts
- Recreational drug use in men who have sex with men (MSM) attending UK sexual health services is significantly higher than in non-MSM
- Methadone plus contingency management or performance feedback reduces cocaine and opiate use in people with drug addiction
- The spectrum of unhealthy drug use and quality of care for hypertension and diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study
- Cannabis and progression to other substance use in young adults: findings from a 13-year prospective population-based study
- Disulfiram was effective in patients with cocaine abuse who were also methadone treated opioid addicts
- Cocaine and the heart
- Self-reported cocaine use, emergency physician testing and outcomes in suspected acute coronary syndromes: a nested matched case–control study
- Disulfiram-induced epileptic seizures