Article Text
Abstract
Objectives: To analyse the decision making for end of life care for patients with cancer at a teaching hospital in Japan at two periods 10 years apart.
Design and setting: Retrospective study conducted in a 550 bed community teaching hospital in Okinawa, Japan.
Patients: There were 124 terminally ill cancer patients (45 women; 79 men; median age, 69 years) admitted either in 1989 and 1999 for end of life care with sufficient data to permit analysis.
Main measurements: Basic demographic data, notification to the patient that he or she had cancer, patient involvement in do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, and various medical interventions which were performed in the month prior to the patient’s death were evaluated.
Results: In 1989 none of the patients were notified of their diagnosis; in 1999 five patients were informed (p = 0.026). Of the 113 (91%) patients with a written DNR order, none were involved in consenting to the DNR order. In the month before death, patients in both groups received non-palliative treatments such as feeding tube placements (five in 1989; five in 1999), total parenteral nutrition (six in 1989; eight in 1999), and intravenous albumin infusion (four in 1989; five in 1999). Morphine use increased (30%) significantly in 1999 compared with the 1989 group.
Conclusions: The majority of patients dying of cancer were still not informed of their diagnosis and were seldom involved in DNR decision making at a teaching hospital in Japan. There was no change in the number of potentially futile interventions that were performed (6–13%) but morphine use increased. Modern ethical education is urgently needed in Japanese medical practice to improve decision making process in the end of life care.
- Do not resuscitate order
- informed consent
- futility
- palliative care
- Japan
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Funding: none.
-
Conflict of interest: none.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Racial disparities in end-of-life suffering within surgical intensive care units
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
- “Do-not-resuscitate” orders in patients with cancer at a children’s hospital in Taiwan
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Association of medical futility with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status in hospitalised patients
- The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study
- End of life decisions: attitudes of Finnish physicians
- Physicians’ confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates