Article info
PDFSymposium on circumcision
The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
- Correspondence to: R Mussell Ethics Department, BMA, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR; rmussellbma.org.uk
Citation
The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
Publication history
- Accepted March 24, 2004
- Revised March 24, 2004
- First published June 1, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Ethics briefings
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Consent for non-therapeutic male circumcision: an exception to the rule?
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Ethics briefings