Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The Canadian Bioethics Society has taken some constructive steps in its attempt to learn from the Olivieri case
We would like to thank the authors and editors of the JME’s minisymposium on the Olivieri case in the February 2004 issue of the journal for continuing and extending the dialogue about this important challenge to the North American bioethics community.
This minisymposium is of special interest to us as members of the Canadian Bioethics Society’s (CBS) working group on employment standards for bioethics. We are members of this working group precisely because we believe that most of us in the Canadian bioethics community ought to do more to respond to situations such as the Olivieri/Apotex affair. We welcome the opportunity to continue to learn from the case and …
Footnotes
-
The authors wish to make it clear that they are not speaking as representatives of the Canadian Bioethics Society. The views expressed here are their own.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics?
- Global bioethics: did the universal declaration on bioethics and human rights miss the boat?
- Whistleblowing in India: what protections can doctors who raise concerns expect?
- Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex Affair in Toronto
- Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students
- Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: the Hub and Spokes Strategy
- A bioethics for all seasons
- Introduction to The Olivieri symposium
- Resource expenditure not resource allocation: response to McDougall on cloning and dignity
- Challenges in making standardisation work in healthcare: lessons from a qualitative interview study of a line-labelling policy in a UK region