Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
- Correspondence to: Professor H M Evans CAHHM, University of Durham, 14/15 Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP, UK; h.m.evansdurham.ac.uk
Citation
Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
Publication history
- Accepted January 12, 2003
- Revised January 10, 2003
- First published April 13, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 13, 2004
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- “Fair’s fair argument” and voluntarism in clinical research: But, is it fair?
- High hospital research participation and improved colorectal cancer survival outcomes: a population-based study
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- SAT0581 Rheumatology Patients' Knowledge about Clinical Research
- Payment for participation in research: a pursuit for the poor?
- Cohort profile: the Scottish Research register SHARE. A register of people interested in research participation linked to NHS data sets
- Children’s views on research without prior consent in emergency situations: a UK qualitative study
- Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress
- Informed consent for functional MRI research on comatose patients following severe brain injury: balancing the social benefits of research against patient autonomy