Article info
PDFResearch ethics
The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion
- Correspondence to: Professor R Lie Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Kalfarveien 31, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Reidar.Liefil.uib.no
Citation
The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion
Publication history
- Received July 26, 2003
- Accepted October 21, 2003
- Revised September 11, 2003
- First published April 13, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The standard of care debate: against the myth of an “international consensus opinion”
- Ethical concerns regarding guidelines for the conduct of clinical research on children
- Cultural considerations for informed consent in paediatric research in low/middle-income countries: a scoping review
- Addressing ethical challenges in HIV prevention research with people who inject drugs
- Algorithm for the support of non-related (serious) adverse events in an Ebola vaccine trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Regulation of biomedical research in Africa
- The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries
- International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines
- Post-trial access to study medication: a Brazilian e-survey with major stakeholders in clinical research
- Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualised results?