Article Text
Abstract
The transplantation of porcine organs to humans could in the future be a solution to the worldwide organ shortage, but is to date still highly experimental. Further research on the potential effects of crossing the species barrier is essential before clinical application is acceptable. However, many crucial questions on efficacy and safety will ultimately only be answered by well designed and controlled solid organ xenotransplantation trials on humans. This paper is concerned with the question under which conditions, given the risks involved and the ethical issues raised, such clinical trials should be resumed. An alternative means of overcoming the safety and ethical issues is suggested: willed body donation for scientific research in the case of permanent vegetative status. This paper argues that conducting trials on such bodies with prior consent is preferable to the use of human subjects without lack of brain function.
- PVS, permanent vegetative state
- xenotransplantation
- safeguards
- clinical trials
- PVS
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Right of the living dead? Consent to experimental surgery in the event of cortical death
- Non-heart beating organ donation: old procurement strategy—new ethical problems
- Individual choice in the definition of death
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Heart surgery and transplantation: innovations impacting on concepts of life and death
- Defining death in non-heart beating organ donors
- Depictions of ‘brain death’ in the media: medical and ethical implications
- Is there a place for CPR and sustained physiological support in brain-dead non-donors?
- The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants
- On the ethical permissibility of in situ reperfusion in cardiac transplantation after the declaration of circulatory death