Article info
PDFThe Olivieri symposium
Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy
- Correspondence to: Professor Arthur Schafer Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics, University of Manitoba, 220 Dysart Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M8; Schafercc.umanitoba.ca
Citation
Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy
Publication history
- Accepted September 1, 2003
- First published February 10, 2004.
Online issue publication
February 10, 2004
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics
- Institutional conflict of interest: attempting to crack the deferiprone mystery
- Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri / Apotex Affair in Toronto
- Introduction to The Olivieri symposium
- Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies ’ websites
- Moving towards less biased research
- Thalassaemia major: the murky story of deferiprone
- Improving researchers ’ conflict of interest declarations
- The Drug Trial: Nancy Olivieri and the Science Scandal that Rocked the Hospital for Sick Children
- Report clears researcher who broke drug company agreement