Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Between universalism and relativism: a conceptual exploration of problems in formulating and applying international biomedical ethical guidelines
  1. G B Tangwa
  1. Correspondence to:
 G B Tangwa
 University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon; gbtangwayahoo.com

Abstract

In this paper, the author attempts to explore some of the problems connected with the formulation and application of international biomedical ethical guidelines, with particular reference to Africa. Recent attempts at revising and updating some international medical ethical guidelines have been bedevilled by intractable controversies and wrangling regarding both the content and formulation. From the vantage position of relative familiarity with both African and Western contexts, and the privilege of having been involved in the revision and updating of one of the international ethical guidelines, the author reflects broadly on these issues and attempts prescribing an approach from both the theoretical and practical angles liable to mitigate, if not completely eliminate, some of the problems and difficulties.

  • CIOMS, Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences
  • DoH, Declaration of Helsinki
  • NBAC, National Bioethics Advisory Commission
  • WMA, World Medical Association
  • universalism
  • relativism
  • ethical imperative
  • guideline
  • research
  • perspective
  • context

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported in part by part of a grant (R25TW01604) from the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, for Bioethics Training for Developing Country Professionals/Researchers

Other content recommended for you