Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In her reply to Baylis the author takes the opportunity to “clarify, and in some cases to correct, some facts”
I am pleased to see Dr Baylis’s article relating to the Olivieri case at the Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto. I thank her for the many facets of that case that she has articulated. Nonetheless, as the bioethicist most closely connected with the case at the clinical level I would like to take this opportunity to clarify, and in some cases to correct, some facts.
Dr Baylis entitles her section on the role of bioethics as “Stories of silence”. I differ from this view. Perhaps the stories are less stories of silence than stories to which others have not listened.
I wish to make it quite clear that I have always supported Dr Olivieri and her colleagues in their actions with respect to the research that is at the centre of this case. I have been public in my support and I continue to be so.
My departure from the Hospital for Sick Children was in no way caused by the Olivieri case. I was offered a challenging position at another Ontario …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics?
- Introduction to The Olivieri symposium
- Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy
- Response to Mary Rowell
- Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex Affair in Toronto
- Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1—descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services
- Absent virtues: the poacher becomes gamekeeper
- Old problems in need of new (narrative) approaches? A young physician–bioethicist’s search for ethical guidance in the practice of physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands
- Thalassaemia major: the murky story of deferiprone
- Report clears researcher who broke drug company agreement