Article Text
Abstract
The Toronto experience suggests that there may be several general lessons for academic health sciences complexes to learn from the Olivieri/Apotex affair (OAA) regarding the ethics, independence, and integrity of clinical research sponsored by for profit enterprises. From a local perspective, the OAA occurred when there already was a focus on the complex and changing relationships among the University of Toronto, its medical school, the fully affiliated teaching hospitals, and off campus faculty because of intertwined interests and responsibilities. The OAA became a catalyst that accelerated various systemic reforms, particularly concerning academic/industry relations. In this article, the evolving governance framework for the Toronto academic health sciences complex is reviewed and these policy and process reforms discussed. These reforms have created collaborative activity among research ethics boards and contract research offices of the partner institutions, and allowed the joint university/hospital ethics centre to play a role in governance and policy, while respecting the missions and mandates of the involved institutions. Although few of the policies are dramatically innovative, what is arguably novel is the elaboration of an overarching governance framework that aims to move ethics to a central focus in the academic complex. Time alone will tell how sustainable and effective these changes are.
- academic medical centres
- conflict of interest
- policy making
- clinical ethics
- clinical trials
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Funding: Dr Singer is supported in part by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Distinguished Investigator award.
-
Dr Ferris is Judicial Affairs Advisor in the Faculty of Medicine and Associate Professor in the Department of Health Sciences at the University of Toronto. Professor Singer is Sun Life Financial Chair and Director of the Joint Centre for Bioethics and also Professor of Medicine at the University of Toronto. Dr Naylor is Dean in the Faculty of Medicine and also Vice Provost for Relations with Health Care Institutions, at the University of Toronto.
-
Declaration of conflict of interest As Dean/Vice Provost since 1999, CD Naylor was involved with the protracted denouement of the L1-OAA affair.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Report clears researcher who broke drug company agreement
- Introduction to The Olivieri symposium
- Clinicians and patients' welfare: where does academic freedom fit in?
- Evaluation of the promotion criteria in an academic medical centre in Singapore
- Negotiating a new chair package: context and considerations
- The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics?
- Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy
- Intimate examinations and other ethical challenges in medical education
- Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians’ attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review
- Barriers to patient enrolment in phase III cancer clinical trials: interviews with clinicians and pharmaceutical industry representatives