Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
D Orentlicher. Princeton University Press, 2001, US$45.00 (hb) US $19.95 (pb), pp 234. ISBN 0–691–08946–9 (hb) ISBN 0–691–08947–7 (pb)
Discrepancies between our moral theories and our practice, particularly as embodied in the law, are not infrequent. The main theme of this book is that this situation is not necessarily a matter for regret and may even be desirable. What scholars have tended to ignore or underplay (though surely at least since Bentham they are aware of it) is the process of translating theory into practice, which is itself something subject to moral evaluation. Orentlicher examines the process in relation to three life and death issues; first euthanasia, then abortion, and finally the withholding of futile treatment.
With reference to euthanasia the problem is that the law draws a distinction between withdrawal of treatment (passive euthanasia) which is legal, and assisted suicide (active euthanasia) which is almost everywhere illegal. But the distinction seems to lack a moral basis. Orentlicher examines in detail attempts to defend the distinction (natural versus unnatural deaths, acts versus omissions, proper pain management removes the need for assisted suicide etc) and does a good job in demolishing them all, concluding at the end of chapter 3 that there is no morally relevant difference.
In chapter 4, however, he argues that a legal distinction between the two is still justified. How can this be? The answer is that there is a real moral distinction to be made between justified and unjustified deaths. By way of illustration he describes the deaths of four different patients. The first patient is a young man of 24 who refuses life saving antibiotics without giving a reason; the second an elderly patient who requires ventilation …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Canadian French and English newspapers’ portrayals of physicians’ role and medical assistance in dying (MAiD) from 1972 to 2016: a qualitative textual analysis
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- Passive euthanasia
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
- The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion