Article Text
Letter
Neonatal outcomes and risk/benefit ratio of induced multiple pregnancies
Statistics from Altmetric.com
During recent years we have seen and assisted at a significantly increased number of twin births. The main reason for this increase in the frequency of twin births is the increasing number of so called “induced pregnancies”, whether through hormonal stimulation or artificial insemination techniques.
It is well known1 that twins have high mortality and morbidity rates during the perinatal and the following period. The characteristics of conception and pregnancy can determine the development of several pathologies, including prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation, …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Preterm twin gestation and cystic periventricular leucomalacia
- Long term outcome of twin-twin transfusion syndrome
- Neonatal outcomes in preterm multiples receiving delayed cord clamping
- Multiple pregnancy in a primigravida with uncorrected Pentalogy of Fallot
- Perinatal Outcome of Preterm Infants <1500 g after IVF pregnancies compared with natural conception
- Exploring the association between chorangioma and infantile haemangioma in singleton and multiple pregnancies: a case–control study in a Swedish tertiary centre
- Fetal Doppler velocimetry and bronchopulmonary dysplasia risk among growth-restricted preterm infants: an observational study
- Effects of antenatal corticosteroids on neonatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies: a Korean national cohort study
- Little and large: the effects of twin growth discordance