Responses
Symposium on psychiatric ethics
The implications of starvation induced psychological changes for the ethical treatment of hunger strikers
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Re: The implications of starvation induced psychological changes for the ethical treatment of hungerPublished on: 18 May 2017
- Published on: 18 May 2017Re: The implications of starvation induced psychological changes for the ethical treatment of hungerShow More
Dear Editor
Dr. Fessler discusses in detail the implications of starvation induced psychological changes for the ethical treatment of hunger strikers,[1] but cannot bring himself in his conclusions to deviate from respecting the competent hunger striker's decision to continue to fast until death. This is clearly also the virtually unanimous Western ethical consensus, giving autonomy the priority over life.
In a...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- The physician and prison hunger strikes: reflecting on the experience in Turkey
- Hunger strikes
- Hunger striking prisoners: the doctors' dilemma
- US military medical ethics in the War on Terror
- Guantanamo force feeding trial: the US is wrong to medicalize hunger striking
- Ethics briefings
- Israeli doctors are given conflicting advice on treating hunger strikers
- Physicians’ ethical obligations to hunger strikers
- What's new this month in BMJ Journals
- Force feeding of mentally competent detainees at Guantánamo Bay