Article info
PDFSymposium on psychiatric ethics
Response to: comments on psychiatry and the control of dangerousness: on the apotropaic function of the term “mental illness”
Citation
Response to: comments on psychiatry and the control of dangerousness: on the apotropaic function of the term “mental illness”
Publication history
- Accepted December 8, 2002
- First published August 20, 2003.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2003 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Psychiatry and the control of dangerousness: on the apotropaic function of the term “mental illness”
- Dangerousness, mental disorder, and responsibility
- Psychiatry and the control of dangerousness: a comment
- The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts
- Coercion in psychiatry: is it right to involuntarily treat inpatients with capacity?
- Neurogenetic evidence in the courtroom: a randomised controlled trial with German judges
- “Idiots, infants, and the insane”: mental illness and legal incompetence
- Creativity, self creation, and the treatment of mental illness
- Mental disorder ethics: theory and empirical investigation
- Collaborative risk assessment in secure and forensic mental health settings in the UK