Article Text
Symposium on the ethics of research publishing
Action v inaction: a case history in ethics
Abstract
The motives behind the author’s decision to resuscitate a patient are examined. This is prompted by the realisation that he ignored the man’s apparent wish not to be saved for fear of criticism from both relatives and colleagues. The way in which decisions are made when the interests of the doctor and the patient clash are briefly explored. Self interest may play a more significant role than is commonly accepted.
- Clinical ethics
- end of life decision making
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- British Thoracic Society guideline for respiratory management of children with neuromuscular weakness
- Outcome of goal-directed non-invasive ventilation and mechanical insufflation/exsufflation in spinal muscular atrophy type I
- Nusinersen for SMA: expanded access programme
- Spinal muscular atrophy–type I
- Effect of nusinersen on respiratory function in paediatric spinal muscular atrophy types 1–3
- Implementation of “the consensus statement for the standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy” when applied to infants with severe type 1 SMA in the UK
- Early out-of-hospital non-invasive ventilation is superior to standard medical treatment in patients with acute respiratory failure: a pilot study
- Long-term ventilation in children: longitudinal trends and outcomes
- Weaning from mechanical ventilation in people with neuromuscular disease: a systematic review
- Long term non-invasive ventilation in the community for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: 46 year experience and review