Article Text
Abstract
In this paper we consider the use of cases in medical ethics research and teaching. To date, there has been little discussion about the consent or confidentiality requirements that ought to govern the use of cases in these areas. This is in marked contrast to the requirements for consent to publish cases in clinical journals, or to use personal information in research. There are a number of reasons why it might be difficult to obtain consent to use cases in ethics. Many cases concern people who are incompetent, and thus unable to give consent. Often the material is of a sensitive nature, it is not clear who should give consent, or the ethicist has no access to those involved. We argue that the use of cases in ethics research and teaching can be justified by appeal to the public interest argument, and suggest a number of areas for discussion and clarification.
- confidentiality
- professional ethics
- publication ethics
- consent
- case studies
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Factors influencing attitudes towards medical confidentiality among Swiss physicians
- Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research
- Teaching ethics in Europe
- Health research and systems’ governance are at risk: should the right to data protection override health?
- Teaching ethics in a Masters Program in Public Health in Lithuania
- To protect or to publish: confidentiality and the fate of the mentally ill victims of Nazi euthanasia
- Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards
- A case of consent
- Valid consent to medical treatment
- That's another story: narrative methods and ethical practice