Article info
Controversy
Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
- Correspondence to: Professor J A Robertson, Law School, University of Texas, 727 Dean Keeton Street, Austin, Texas, USA; jrobertson{at}mail.law.utexas.edu
Citation
Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
Publication history
- Accepted October 28, 2002
- First published August 20, 2003.
Online issue publication
August 20, 2003
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2003 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Preimplantation genetic testing
- An analysis of US fertility centre educational materials suggests that informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis may be inadequate
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Bach to the future: response to: Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing
- Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?
- Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a step by step guide to recent Italian ethical and legislative troubles
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people