Article Text
Controversy
Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
Abstract
New uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to screen embryos prior to transfer raise ethical, legal, and policy issues that deserve close attention. Extensions for medical purposes, such as to identify susceptibility genes, late onset disease, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching, are usually ethically acceptable. Whether embryo screening for gender, perfect pitch, or other non-medical characteristics are also acceptable depends upon the parental needs served and the harm posed to embryos, children, and society. Speculations about potential future uses of PGD should not prevent otherwise acceptable current uses of PGD.
- HLA matching
- embryo screening
- gender selection
- non-medical screening
- preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Preimplantation genetic testing
- An analysis of US fertility centre educational materials suggests that informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis may be inadequate
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Bach to the future: response to: Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing
- Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?
- Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a step by step guide to recent Italian ethical and legislative troubles
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people