Article Text
Abstract
Protocols for retrieving vital organs in consenting patients in cardiovascular arrest (non-heart beating donors, NHBD) rest on the assumptions that irreversible asystole a) identifies the instant of biological death, and b) is clinically assessable at the time when retrieval of vital organs is possible. Unfortunately both assumptions are flawed. We argue that traditional life/death definitions could be actually inadequate to represent the reality of dying under intensive support, and we suggest redefining NHBD protocols on moral, social, and antrhopological criteria, admitting that irreversible (however defined) asystole can only equate a clinically determinable point of no return in the process of dying, where organ retrieval can be morally and socially accepted in previously consenting patients.
- organ donation
- definition of death
- non-heart beating organ donors
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Linked Articles
Other content recommended for you
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine
- Death and organ donation: back to the future
- Individual choice in the definition of death
- Death and legal fictions
- Organismal death, the dead-donor rule and the ethics of vital organ procurement
- Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications
- A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy
- Should individuals choose their definition of death?
- Abandoning the Dead Donor Rule