Article info
PDFOriginal Article
Modified mandated choice for organ procurement
- Correspondence to: P Chouhan, c/o Dr H Draper, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, The Medical School (Primary Care/T Building), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; poonamchouhan{at}doctors.org.uk
Citation
Modified mandated choice for organ procurement
Publication history
- Accepted July 2, 2002
- Revised June 24, 2002
- First published June 1, 2003.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2003 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Do the sick have a right to cadaveric organs?
- Advance commitment: an alternative approach to the family veto problem in organ procurement
- Meeting the demand for donor organs in the US
- An antidote to the emerging two tier organ donation policy in Canada: the Public Cadaveric Organ Donation Program
- Presumed consent for transplantation: a dead issue after Alder Hey?
- The UK Human Tissue Act and consent: surrendering a fundamental principle to transplantation needs?
- Normative consent and opt-out organ donation
- The potential impact of an opt-out system for organ donation in the UK
- A nudge in the right direction for organ donation—but is it enough?
- The organs crisis and the Spanish model: theoretical versus pragmatic considerations