Article Text
PDFElectronic pages
JME reviewers 1998–2002
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Thank you to the journal’s assessors
We would like to thank assessors, listed below, who have helped on editions of the journal over the last five years. Their advice, guidance, and …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Searching for the best evidence. Part 1: where to look
- To review or not to review, that is the question
- Pitfalls of editorial miscommunication
- Exploring digital health interventions to support community health workers in low-and-middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol
- Characteristics of immunisation support programmes in Canada: a scoping review and environmental scan
- Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey
- Publication rate for funded studies from a major UK health research funder: a cohort study
- Protocol for a scoping review of skin self-care of people with spinal cord injury
- Crossing the Chasm
- Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals