Article Text
Original Article
What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
Abstract
This paper examines the current Australian regulatory response to human reproductive cloning. The central consideration is the capacity of the current regulatory regime to effectively deter human cloning efforts. A legislative prohibition on human cloning must be both effective and clear enough to allow researchers to know what practices are acceptable.
This paper asks whether the current Australian regime evinces these qualities and suggests that Australia should follow the example set in the UK by the enactment of the Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001.
- cloning
- human reproductive cloning
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel