Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Bioethics should update its conception of the gene
The 25th of April marks the 50th anniversary of the publication in Nature of the letter by James Watson and Francis Crick announcing their solution to the structure of deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA).1 By that time, much was known about the role of chromosomes in inheritance, the contribution of DNA to chromosome structure, and the chemistry of DNA.2 The gene concept itself was also well established by then; the principal scientific problem became to specify what genes were in molecular terms and how they functioned in the cell during ordinary function and cell division.
The importance of the solution of the structure of DNA was twofold. First, it gave insight into finding a mechanism for DNA replication, as the authors recognised in this famous sentence:
It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a copying mechanism for the genetic material.3 …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Basic genetics for the clinical neurologist
- Basic molecular genetics for epidemiologists
- The book of life
- Out of date: genetics, history and the British novel of the 1990s
- In vivo imaging with oligonucleotides for diagnosis and drug development
- Gregor Mendel, OSA (1822–1884), founder of scientific genetics
- Narrative Medicine Theory and Practice: the Double Helix Model
- DNA repair disorders
- Does chaos theory have major implications for philosophy of medicine?
- Faecal microbiota transplants: towards a healthy disgust scepticism