Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
R M Green. Oxford University press, 2001, £22.50, $US29.95, pp 231. ISBN 0195109473
United States ethicist Ronald M Green approaches the issue of embryo research (ER) in the very accessible form of a “philosophical memoir” (xv). Reporting in detail from his experience of serving on several high level ethics advisory boards, focusing mostly on his membership of the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) 1994 human embryo research panel, Green portrays both the functioning of this increasingly more influential form of institutionalised ethics, as well as the social and political dynamics governing its (in)effectiveness. The author also covers extensive ground regarding the subject matter of ER itself and familiarises the reader with the technical issues and conceptual conundrums (potentiality, moral status, harming future persons) involved.
Green states in the title of The Human Embryo Research Debates: Bioethics in the Vortex of Controversy, that he is concerned with a plurality of debates. Examining the discourse in the US, he first deals with the different areas in which ER is debated: of the book’s eight chapters, chapters one and four stress the relevance of ER for the fields of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) research, the study of birth defects, and the development of contraceptive methods. Chapter 6 deals with the relation of ER to reproductive cloning; Green formulates a comprehensive …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic. Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument