Article Text
Brief report
Introducing “ERIC”, a living research ethics database
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Research ethics committees (RECs) in the UK are under criticism for inconsistency in both process and opinion. As chairmen of a multicentre REC and a local REC, we felt that one possible reason was the lack of convenient, up to date guidance for chairmen, administrators, and members.
We recognised that there is no shortage of material for REC members to read but it is time consuming to access and difficult to apply to questions raised by review of research projects. International bodies have produced guidance; political organisations and governments have laid down …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity
- Should research ethics committees meet in public?
- Gender equality in the work of local research ethics committees in Europe: a study of practice in five countries
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK