Article Text
Abstract
Objective: To assess the knowledge of four groups of individuals regarding who is legally authorised to consent to health care or research involving older patients.
Design: A provincewide postal survey.
Setting: Province of Quebec, Canada.
Participants: Three hundred older adults, 434 informal caregivers of cognitively impaired individuals, 98 researchers in aging and 136 members of research ethics boards (REBs).
Measurements: Knowledge was assessed through a pretested postal questionnaire comprising five vignettes that describe hypothetical situations involving an older adult who requires medical care or is solicited for research. The respondent had to identify the person who is legally authorised to provide consent.
Results: Nearly 80% of all respondents provided the correct answer when the hypothetical scenario depicted a person who was competent to consent or incompetent but legally represented. Knowledge was worse (from 2% among older adults to 44% among REB members) for the scenario describing a research situation that involved an incompetent adult without a legal guardian.
Conclusion: The observed lack of knowledge raises doubts about the ability of current legislation to truly protect the rights of older adults with diminished decision making capacity. It points to the need for educational programmes aimed at increasing public awareness of the legislation put in place for those requiring special protection.
- substituted consent
- legislation
- knowledge
- older adult
- informal caregiver
- researcher
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Post-trial access to study medication: a Brazilian e-survey with major stakeholders in clinical research
- Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia
- Development of a patient-centred medication management model for polymedicated home-dwelling older adults after hospital discharge: results of a mixed methods study
- Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards
- Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people in need of care or support: protocol for a SARS-CoV-2 registry
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Informal caregiver support needs and burden: a survey in Lithuania
- Exploration of home care nurse’s experiences in deprescribing of medications: a qualitative descriptive study
- Optimising patient active role with a user-centred eHealth platform (CONCERTO+) in chronic diseases management: a study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial