Article Text
Abstract
The extraordinary events surrounding the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in the United Kingdom have not only placed in jeopardy the use of this triple vaccine but have also spread concern to other parts of the world. Examination of the public’s worry about MMR vaccine reveals they have been exposed to a range of conflicting views resulting in the feeling of having been misled about the safety of the vaccine. There are various groups and individuals who have legitimate roles in informing the public about such subjects. But is each one behaving in an ethically responsible way? And if confidence falters, vaccine coverage dips, and an outbreak of measles, mumps, or rubella ensues, who, if anyone, will stand and say “I misled them, I confused them, this is my responsibility”? We examine the ethical issues of each group with a voice in the debate about vaccine safety.
- MMR vaccine
- vaccine safety
- public health
- immunisation
- WHO
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- MMR vaccine—worries are not justified
- MMR: where are we now?
- MMR vaccine - how effective and how safe?
- Protecting people with multiple sclerosis through vaccination
- MMR: marginalised, misrepresented and rejected? Autism: a focus group study
- Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study
- Safety of measles, mumps and rubella vaccination in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
- Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and bowel problems or developmental regression in children with autism: population study
- Bacterial infections, immune overload, and MMR vaccine
- MMR vaccine and autism