Article Text
Abstract
Against a background of increasing regulation regarding access to medical information and the presentation of patients' confidentiality, the case of genetic information raises interesting questions about whether the application of general rules is appropriate in all situations. Whilst all genetic information is not equally sensitive, some of it is highly predictive. It also allows deductions to be made about other family members. It may not be regarded as particularly sensitive when compared to other types of medical information and those to whom it applies may not be as anxious about preserving their confidentiality as compared with—for example, the prospect of seeing research into cause and cures for rare diseases put in hand. These distinctions also find resonance with the general public. Resolving conflicting tensions will require subtlety, not a blunt “one size fits all” model.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?
- Is there a duty to share genetic information?
- Genetics and public health—evolution, or revolution?
- Development of the Tailored Rett Intervention and Assessment Longitudinal (TRIAL) database and the Rett Evaluation of Symptoms and Treatments (REST) Questionnaire
- The new genetics: Genetic testing and public policy
- Genetic risk and behavioural change
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: empirical evidence from a cross sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom
- Use of zebrafish models to investigate rare human disease
- Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases
- Firing up the nature/nurture controversy: bioethics and genetic determinism