Article Text
Debate
Tobacco, taxation, and fairness
Abstract
The author defends himself against an attack by Smith and Bopp on his views on smoking and taxation. The theory that, on the grounds of equity and/or fairness, smokers should pay via taxation on tobacco for the health care costs of treating smoking-related medical conditions is discussed and shown to be defective. It is argued that the fundamental mistake that Smith and Bopp make is to confuse and conflate the separate issues of whether particular taxes are fair and whether they are justifiable. The conclusion is reached that an excise duty on tobacco is a good tax. It is a non-fair or even an unfair tax but it is justified on grounds other than fairness.
- Smoking
- tobacco
- taxation
- fairness
- justice
- equity
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Linked Articles
- Research Article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy
- What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies
- Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies
- The role of taxation in tobacco control and its potential economic impact in China
- The 2019 economic cost of smoking-attributable diseases in Indonesia
- The economics of tobacco: myths and realities
- Smokers’ strategies across social grades to minimise the cost of smoking in a period with annual tax increases: evidence from a national survey in England
- Individualised tobacco affordability in the UK 2002–2014: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project
- Basic economic gap related to smoking: reconciling tobacco tax receipts and economic costs of smoking-attributable diseases
- Exploring indigenous perspectives on tobacco tax: how some Māori families are responding in Aotearoa New Zealand