Article Text
Original Article
The ethics of prophylactic antibiotics for neurosurgical procedures
Abstract
The prophylactic use of antibiotics has become a routine procedure in many areas of medicine. In neurosurgery, however, there is considerable debate over their use in the prevention of postoperative infection. We pose several ethical questions about antibiotic prophylaxis in a neurosurgical setting. These questions are discussed under the following categories: responsible usage of antibiotics; the ethical dilemmas of controlled, antibiotic clinical trials, and some problems inherent in not using prophylactic antibiotics.
- Antibiotic prophylaxis
- clinical trials
- infection
- neurosurgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
- The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in hip arthroscopy is under-reported and lacks evidence-based guidelines: a systematic review and survey
- Can antibiotic use be both just and sustainable… or only more or less so?
- Antimicrobial prophylaxis for orthopaedic surgery
- Retrospective study in 608 cases on the rate of surgical site infections after orbital surgery without prophylactic systemic antibiotics
- Predictors of infection from dog bite wounds: which patients may benefit from prophylactic antibiotics?
- Antibiotic management of urinary tract infection in elderly patients in primary care and its association with bloodstream infections and all cause mortality: population based cohort study
- Impact of prophylactic and ‘rescue pack’ antibiotics on the airway microbiome in chronic lung disease
- The role of infection in acute pancreatitis
- Metformin and other glucose-lowering drug initiation and rates of community-based antibiotic use and hospital-treated infections in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study