Article Text
Research ethics
Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research
Abstract
Ethics committees now require that individuals give informed consent to much health services research, in the same way as for clinical research. This is misguided. Existing ethical guidelines do not help us decide how to seek consent in these cases, and have allowed managerial experimentation to remain largely unchecked. Inappropriate requirements for individual consent can institutionalise health inequalities and reduce access to services for vulnerable groups. This undermines the fundamental purpose of the National Health Service (NHS), and ignores our rights and duties as its members, explored here. Alternative forms of community consent should be actively pursued.
- Informed consent
- health services research
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Other content recommended for you
- The impossibility of informed consent?
- Developing a new model for patient recruitment in mental health services: a cohort study using Electronic Health Records
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Research is ‘a step into the unknown’: an exploration of pharmacists’ perceptions of factors impacting on research participation in the NHS
- Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Improving the management of multimorbidity in general practice: protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial (The 3D Study)
- A qualitative study on clinical research in Finland: fragmented governance and volume in the 2000s
- “Fair’s fair argument” and voluntarism in clinical research: But, is it fair?
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity