The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical record
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Assessing the quality of primary healthcare in seven Chinese provinces with unannounced standardised patients: protocol of a cross-sectional survey
- Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings
- Estimating misclassification error in a binary performance indicator: case study of low value care in Australian hospitals
- A national evaluation using standardised patient actors to assess STI services in public sector clinical sentinel surveillance facilities in South Africa
- Tuberculosis diagnosis and management in the public versus private sector: a standardised patients study in Mumbai, India
- Accuracy of lung cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Umbria, Napoli 3 Sud and Friuli Venezia Giulia administrative healthcare databases: a diagnostic accuracy study
- Patient recall versus physician documentation in report of smoking cessation counselling performed in the inpatient setting
- Stroke care: how do we measure quality?
- Simulations in the United States Medical Licensing Examination™ (USMLE™)
- Performance of externally validated enhanced computer-aided versions of the National Early Warning Score in predicting mortality following an emergency admission to hospital in England: a cross-sectional study