Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
L van Zyl. Ashgate, 2000, £40.00 (hb), pp 230. ISBN 0-7546-1231-7
Can virtue ethics tell us what to do? And has principlism had its day? These are two of the questions that van Zyl’s text seeks to answer in the affirmative. Van Zyl wishes to encourage an approach to medical practice that draws upon the requirements of virtue ethics, in preference to principlist (primarily deontological and consequentialist) ethics. Her account then relates these twin themes to one concrete realm of medical practice, decisions taken at the end of life.
Van Zyl believes that the process of modernisation has not only affected medicine, in its evolution from an “art” into a “science”, but also medical or bio-ethics, in its move to a principlist ethic, which demands the application of universal, rational, objective rules to “cases”. Such shifts account for some dissatisfaction with the medical focus, since it is just that, while …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Fidelity to the healing relationship: a medical student's challenge to contemporary bioethics and prescription for medical practice
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- The virtues (and vices) of the four principles
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- The revised International Code of Medical Ethics: an exercise in international professional ethical self-regulation
- Medical ethics: principles, persons, and perspectives: from controversy to conversation
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine