Article info
PDFDebate
Response to Kuhse
- Correspondence to: R M Perkin, Professor and Chairman, Department of Pediatrics, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, 3E-142, Brody Medical Sciences Building, Greenville, NC 27858—4354, USA; perkinr{at}mail.ecu.edu
Citation
Response to Kuhse
Publication history
- Accepted April 22, 2002
- Revised April 22, 2002
- First published August 1, 2002.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2002 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Response to Ronald M Perkin and David B Resnik: The agony of trying to match sanctity of life and patient-centred medical care
- The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- Neuromuscular blockers—a means of palliation?
- Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- Influence of physicians’ life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries