Article info
PDFSpecial clinical ethics symposium: the case of Ms B
A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B
- Correspondence to: D Coleman, President, Not Dead Yet, 7521 Madison Street, Forest Park, IL 60130, USA; ndycoleman{at}aol.com
Citation
A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B
Publication history
- Accepted May 20, 2002
- First published August 1, 2002.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2002 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The case of Ms B: suicide’s slippery slope?
- Mrs Pretty and Ms B
- Ms B and Diane Pretty: a commentary
- Preserving women’s reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany
- The case of Ms B and the “right to die”
- Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- Competence for physician-assisted death of patients with mental disorders: theoretical and practical considerations
- Disability and narrative: new directions for medicine and the medical humanities