Article Text
Special clinical ethics symposium: the case of Ms B
Ms B and Diane Pretty: a commentary
Abstract
In two recent court cases, Ms B, a paralysed competent adult, was allowed to end her life; Mrs Pretty, another paralysed competent adult, was not. In legal terms, the essential difference between the two cases is that Ms B was seeking the withdrawal of treatment, whereas Mrs Pretty was asking for assistance in ending her life. I argue that while this distinction may accurately state the law that governs these situations, it does not rest on a defensible moral basis. Both the women should have been allowed to choose the manner in which they would die.
- Law and medical ethics
- end-of-life decisions
- assisted suicide
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Mrs Pretty and Ms B
- The case of Ms B: suicide’s slippery slope?
- The wish to die and hastening death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A scoping review
- Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on medical law
- Patient fails in attempt to get law on aiding suicide abroad clarified
- Ethics and decision making in end stage lung disease
- Dying woman's demand for right to assisted suicide is rejected
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- The law looks at assisted dying