Article Text
Abstract
The Roman Catholic Church in Australia has lobbied politicians to prohibit embryonic stem cell research, on the grounds that such research violates the sanctity and inherent dignity of human life. I suggest, however, that reasoned reflection does not uniquely support such conclusions about the morality of stem cell research. A recent parliamentary standing committee report recommended that embryonic stem cell research be allowed to proceed in certain circumstances, and there appears to be widespread support in the Australian community for this position. I argue that the moral value of democracy requires parliamentarians to acknowledge the informed views of the wider community here, and to resist lobbying by church leaders on this issue.
- Religion
- law
- embryonic stem cell research
- Roman Catholic church
- democracy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Law and policy in the era of reproductive genetics
- The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)
- Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?