Article info
PDFSpecial symposium: religion, the law, and medical ethics
Religious meddling: a comment on Skene and Parker
- Correspondence to: Professor C A J Coady, Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010; t.coady{at}unimelb.edu.au
Citation
Religious meddling: a comment on Skene and Parker
Publication history
- Accepted January 16, 2002
- Revised January 15, 2002
- First published August 1, 2002.
Online issue publication
August 01, 2002
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2002 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- What is it to practise good medical ethics? A Muslim's perspective
- Secularism needs a distinctive medical voice
- Design and pilot testing of a church-based intervention to address interpersonal and intrapersonal barriers to uptake of family planning in rural Tanzania: a qualitative implementation study
- Doing good medical ethics: a Christian perspective
- Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children?
- Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion
- Women in pain: how narratives of pain and sacrifice complicate the debate over the Catholic provision of obstetrical care
- The role of the church in developing the law: response to commentators
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality