Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Edited by S M Reverby. University of North Carolina Press, 2000, £52.50 (hc), £19.95 (sc), pp 630. ISBN 0-8078-4852-2
No one interested in the ethics of biomedical research will have failed to hear about the Tuskegee syphilis study, or, to give it its full title, the US Public Health Service's Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male. This study, conducted from 1932 to 1972, on black (African American) males in Tuskegee, Alabama, has, with complete justification, become the paradigm of moral depravity in the field of biomedical research. Virtually every rule of good, ethical research was broken during this “research” over a period of 40 years, down to denying participants even the knowledge, let alone the option, of a remedy when it became available.
In recent years, the Tuskegee syphilis study has received renewed public attention, for two reasons. First, in 1996, 24 years after …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Peter Buxtun: US government employee who exposed racist and unethical Tuskegee syphilis study
- Bill Jenkins: epidemiologist and activist who blew the whistle on the US government’s Tuskegee syphilis study
- Ethics gone awry: the US Public Health Service studies in Guatemala; 1946–1948
- Tuskegee: could it happen again?
- President Obama apologises to Guatemala over 1940s syphilis study
- Rasing the ivory tower: the production of knowledge and distrust of medicine among African Americans
- Spectre of racism in health and health care: lessons from history and the United States
- Ethics briefings
- Assuring research integrity in the wake of Wakefield
- US commission recommends increased protection for people in research after reviewing 1940s syphilis study