Article Text
Debate
One principle and a fourth fallacy of disability studies
Abstract
This brief paper shows that the idea of benefits to the subject compensating for the harms of disability is at best self defeating and at worst sinister. Equally benefits to third parties while real are dubious as compensating factors. This shows that disabilities are just that, a net loss and not a net gain.
- Disability
- impairment
- handicap
- equality
- social conception of disability
- harmed condition conception of disability
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- One principle and three fallacies of disability studies
- Paternity fraud and compensation for misattributed paternity
- One principle and three fallacies of disability studies
- Relationship between neuropsychiatric disorders and cognitive and behavioural change in MND
- Risk factors for cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- A rapidly progressive neuropathy
- Dementia and aphasia in motor neuron disease: an underrecognised association?
- Malingering and factitious disorder
- Caregiver burden and associated factors among primary caregivers of patients with ALS in home care: a cross-sectional survey study
- Grey matter correlates of clinical variables in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): a neuroimaging study of ALS motor phenotype heterogeneity and cortical focality