Article Text
Debate
One principle and three fallacies of disability studies
Abstract
A question between John Harris and I is the degree to which lessons may be learned, and insights gained, from a life distinguished by physical differences. He argues it as the “aborting Beethoven fallacy”, I insist on the evidence that what we learn from physical differences may be critical and life enhancing.
- Disability
- impairment
- handicap
- equality
- social conception of disability
- harmed condition conception of disability
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genetics insight into the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia spectrum
- Classification of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by family history: effects on frequency of genes mutation
- Genetic counselling in ALS: facts, uncertainties and clinical suggestions
- Pathophysiological insights into ALS with C9ORF72 expansions
- FUS mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: clinical, pathological, neurophysiological and genetic analysis
- Molecular and cellular pathways of neurodegeneration in motor neurone disease
- Younger age of onset in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a result of pathogenic gene variants, rather than ascertainment bias
- Advances in molecular pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- Evidence for polygenic and oligogenic basis of Australian sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- Kinnier Wilson’s puzzling features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis