Article info
PDFDebate
A defence of the potential future of value theory
- Correspondence to: Professor D Marquis, Department of Philosophy, 1445 Jayhawk Blvd, Room 3090, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7590, USA; dmarquis{at}ku.edu
Citation
A defence of the potential future of value theory
Publication history
- Accepted February 14, 2002
- Revised February 4, 2002
- First published June 1, 2002.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2002 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- A future like ours revisited
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- Abortion and human nature
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva